Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights
Social Affairs64%★
- title/description contains "workers"
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights”. S&D, Greens-EFA, Left and NI voted mostly in favour, while EPP, PfE, Renew and ESN voted mostly against. ECR mostly abstained. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (239 for, 299 against, 41 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Italy42
- Spain26
- Hungary10
- Sweden9
- Greece8
- Germany43
- France42
- Poland27
- Netherlands19
- Czech Republic15
- Austria
- Belgium
- Croatia
- Denmark
- Finland
- Germany
- Greece
- Ireland
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…