Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights
Social Affairs64%★
- title/description contains "workers"
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓Close result
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Addressing subcontracting chains and the role of intermediaries in order to protect workers’ rights”. S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, Left and NI voted mostly in favour, while EPP, PfE, ECR and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (258 for, 290 against, 28 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- France30
- Portugal12
- Belgium10
- Denmark9
- Ireland9
- Germany42
- Poland41
- Italy30
- Spain27
- Netherlands17
- Austria
- Belgium
- Bulgaria
- Croatia
- Estonia
- France
- Germany
- Greece
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…