EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2026-02-12

Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran

Foreign Affairs75%
Confidence: 75%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title contains non-EU country "iran"
Reviewed: yes
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Foreign Affairs
Human Rights64%
Confidence: 64%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "arbitrary detention"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Human Rights
Vote ID 185288Source: official EP roll-call records
52
/ 100

Importance Score

Medium importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • High-interest topic: Human Rights
  • Some political group division
  • Some national delegation divergence
  • Close result
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+10 / 15
Turnout+4 / 5
Vote type+0 / 25
Close vote+10 / 15
Legislative+0 / 15
Rebel votes+10 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+8 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran”. EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and NI voted mostly in favour, while S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a narrow margin (257 for, 275 against, 36 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions. The outcome was close, which makes individual choices and absences especially consequential.

Result analysis

For
257
Against
275
Abstain
36
Margin of victory
18 votes
Turnout (cast)
568
Absent
151
Participation rate
79.0%
⚠️This was a close vote — the margin was small relative to the votes cast.

Close vote analysis

The margin was 18 votes. 151 MEPs did not vote.

Could absences have changed the outcome? The number of absent MEPs (151) was larger than the 18-vote margin, so absences were numerically significant.

Groups whose absences exceeded the margin

  • EPPhad 45 absent MEPs (margin was 18)
  • S&Dhad 24 absent MEPs (margin was 18)
  • PfEhad 22 absent MEPs (margin was 18)

Countries whose absences exceeded the margin

Hungary (20 absent)Italy (20 absent)Germany (19 absent)

Absences larger than the margin are numerically significant but do NOT imply the outcome would have changed. That would require modelling how each absent member would have voted, which this analysis does not do.

By political group

EPP185 MEPs
For 90Against 20Abstain 30Absent 45
S&D135 MEPs
For 0Against 111Abstain 0Absent 24
ECR82 MEPs
For 66Against 0Abstain 0Absent 16
Renew78 MEPs
For 2Against 61Abstain 0Absent 15
PfE84 MEPs
For 61Against 0Abstain 1Absent 22
Greens/EFA53 MEPs
For 1Against 42Abstain 0Absent 10
The Left45 MEPs
For 1Against 36Abstain 0Absent 8
ESN27 MEPs
For 22Against 0Abstain 2Absent 3
NI29 MEPs
For 13Against 5Abstain 3Absent 8

Country angle

Most in favour
  • France34
  • Italy28
  • Spain27
  • Poland22
  • Czech Republic16
Most against
  • Germany53
  • Netherlands15
  • Belgium12
  • Sweden11
  • Denmark10
Divided delegations
  • Austria
  • Bulgaria
  • Croatia
  • Cyprus
  • France
  • Greece
  • Ireland
  • Italy
Full breakdown by all countries
Austria20 MEPs
For 5Against 8Abstain 2Absent 5
Belgium22 MEPs
For 4Against 12Abstain 2Absent 4
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 8Against 5Abstain 0Absent 4
Croatia12 MEPs
For 6Against 5Abstain 0Absent 1
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 3Against 3Abstain 0Absent 0
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 16Against 1Abstain 2Absent 2
Denmark15 MEPs
For 5Against 10Abstain 0Absent 0
Estonia7 MEPs
For 2Against 4Abstain 1Absent 0
Finland15 MEPs
For 2Against 9Abstain 0Absent 4
France81 MEPs
For 34Against 29Abstain 0Absent 18
Germany96 MEPs
For 21Against 53Abstain 3Absent 19
Greece21 MEPs
For 10Against 8Abstain 0Absent 3
Hungary21 MEPs
For 1Against 0Abstain 0Absent 20
Ireland14 MEPs
For 5Against 7Abstain 0Absent 2
Italy76 MEPs
For 28Against 26Abstain 2Absent 20
Latvia9 MEPs
For 5Against 2Abstain 0Absent 2
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 3Against 5Abstain 1Absent 2
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 1Against 3Abstain 1Absent 1
Malta6 MEPs
For 2Against 3Abstain 0Absent 1
Netherlands31 MEPs
For 13Against 15Abstain 0Absent 3
Poland53 MEPs
For 22Against 4Abstain 20Absent 7
Portugal21 MEPs
For 7Against 9Abstain 0Absent 5
Romania33 MEPs
For 10Against 10Abstain 2Absent 11
Slovakia15 MEPs
For 5Against 5Abstain 0Absent 5
Slovenia9 MEPs
For 5Against 3Abstain 0Absent 1
Spain60 MEPs
For 27Against 25Abstain 0Absent 8
Sweden21 MEPs
For 7Against 11Abstain 0Absent 3

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share