EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2026-02-12

Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran

Foreign Affairs75%
Confidence: 75%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title contains non-EU country "iran"
Reviewed: yes
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Foreign Affairs
Human Rights64%
Confidence: 64%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "arbitrary detention"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Human Rights
Vote ID 185289Source: official EP roll-call records
68
/ 100

Importance Score

High importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Main vote
  • Legislative procedure
  • High-interest topic: Human Rights
  • Some political group division
  • High participation
  • Some MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+10 / 15
Turnout+4 / 5
Vote type+25 / 25
Close vote+0 / 15
Legislative+15 / 15
Rebel votes+4 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+0 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran”. EPP, S&D, Renew, ECR, PfE, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly in favour. ESN and NI mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (524 for, 3 against, 41 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.

Result analysis

For
524
Against
3
Abstain
41
Margin of victory
521 votes
Turnout (cast)
568
Absent
151
Participation rate
79.0%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP185 MEPs
For 144Against 0Abstain 0Absent 41
S&D135 MEPs
For 110Against 0Abstain 0Absent 25
Renew78 MEPs
For 62Against 1Abstain 0Absent 15
ECR82 MEPs
For 63Against 0Abstain 0Absent 19
PfE84 MEPs
For 54Against 0Abstain 7Absent 23
Greens/EFA53 MEPs
For 43Against 0Abstain 0Absent 10
The Left45 MEPs
For 36Against 0Abstain 0Absent 9
ESN27 MEPs
For 5Against 0Abstain 20Absent 2
NI29 MEPs
For 7Against 2Abstain 13Absent 7

Country angle

Most in favour
  • France63
  • Germany61
  • Italy54
  • Spain51
  • Poland41
Most against

None.

Divided delegations

None notably divided.

Full breakdown by all countries
Austria20 MEPs
For 10Against 0Abstain 5Absent 5
Belgium22 MEPs
For 15Against 1Abstain 0Absent 6
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 10Against 0Abstain 3Absent 4
Croatia12 MEPs
For 11Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 6Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 16Against 0Abstain 3Absent 2
Denmark15 MEPs
For 14Against 0Abstain 1Absent 0
Estonia7 MEPs
For 7Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Finland15 MEPs
For 11Against 0Abstain 0Absent 4
France81 MEPs
For 63Against 0Abstain 0Absent 18
Germany96 MEPs
For 61Against 0Abstain 16Absent 19
Greece21 MEPs
For 16Against 2Abstain 1Absent 2
Hungary21 MEPs
For 0Against 0Abstain 1Absent 20
Ireland14 MEPs
For 12Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Italy76 MEPs
For 54Against 0Abstain 0Absent 22
Latvia9 MEPs
For 7Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 9Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 6Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Malta6 MEPs
For 5Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Netherlands31 MEPs
For 29Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Poland53 MEPs
For 41Against 0Abstain 4Absent 8
Portugal21 MEPs
For 16Against 0Abstain 0Absent 5
Romania33 MEPs
For 23Against 0Abstain 1Absent 9
Slovakia15 MEPs
For 5Against 0Abstain 5Absent 5
Slovenia9 MEPs
For 8Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Spain60 MEPs
For 51Against 0Abstain 1Absent 8
Sweden21 MEPs
For 18Against 0Abstain 0Absent 3

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share