EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2026-03-10

Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing

Vote ID 187192Source: official EP roll-call records
27
/ 100

Importance Score

Low importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Strong political group division
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+0 / 15
Turnout+5 / 5
Vote type+0 / 25
Close vote+0 / 15
Legislative+0 / 15
Rebel votes+10 / 10
Group division+12 / 15
Country division+0 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA and NI voted mostly in favour, while PfE and ESN voted mostly against. ECR and Left mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (443 for, 87 against, 96 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.

Result analysis

For
443
Against
87
Abstain
96
Margin of victory
356 votes
Turnout (cast)
626
Absent
92
Participation rate
87.2%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP184 MEPs
For 157Against 1Abstain 1Absent 25
S&D135 MEPs
For 121Against 1Abstain 0Absent 13
ECR82 MEPs
For 9Against 12Abstain 54Absent 7
Renew78 MEPs
For 68Against 2Abstain 1Absent 7
PfE84 MEPs
For 18Against 37Abstain 11Absent 18
Greens/EFA53 MEPs
For 46Against 0Abstain 0Absent 7
The Left45 MEPs
For 6Against 12Abstain 19Absent 8
NI29 MEPs
For 18Against 0Abstain 7Absent 4
ESN27 MEPs
For 0Against 21Abstain 3Absent 3

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Germany68
  • Spain41
  • France34
  • Italy31
  • Netherlands23
Most against

None.

Divided delegations
  • Czech Republic
  • France
Full breakdown by all countries
Austria20 MEPs
For 20Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Belgium22 MEPs
For 14Against 5Abstain 2Absent 1
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 10Against 3Abstain 2Absent 2
Croatia12 MEPs
For 10Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 5Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 11Against 7Abstain 2Absent 1
Denmark15 MEPs
For 11Against 2Abstain 1Absent 1
Estonia7 MEPs
For 5Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Finland15 MEPs
For 11Against 1Abstain 3Absent 0
France81 MEPs
For 34Against 28Abstain 2Absent 17
Germany95 MEPs
For 68Against 13Abstain 5Absent 9
Greece21 MEPs
For 13Against 1Abstain 5Absent 2
Hungary21 MEPs
For 9Against 0Abstain 1Absent 11
Ireland14 MEPs
For 12Against 0Abstain 1Absent 1
Italy76 MEPs
For 31Against 10Abstain 30Absent 5
Latvia9 MEPs
For 5Against 1Abstain 3Absent 0
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 8Against 0Abstain 2Absent 1
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 5Against 0Abstain 1Absent 0
Malta6 MEPs
For 5Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Netherlands31 MEPs
For 23Against 1Abstain 6Absent 1
Poland53 MEPs
For 21Against 5Abstain 20Absent 7
Portugal21 MEPs
For 17Against 2Abstain 2Absent 0
Romania33 MEPs
For 22Against 0Abstain 5Absent 6
Slovakia15 MEPs
For 10Against 3Abstain 0Absent 2
Slovenia9 MEPs
For 8Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Spain60 MEPs
For 41Against 0Abstain 3Absent 16
Sweden21 MEPs
For 14Against 5Abstain 0Absent 2

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share