Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Some MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly in favour, while ECR, PfE, NI and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (440 for, 157 against, 24 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany71
- France40
- Italy40
- Spain39
- Poland23
- Czech Republic9
- Slovakia7
- Cyprus
- Czech Republic
- Hungary
- Italy
- Latvia
- Poland
- Slovakia
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…