EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2026-03-11

European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026

Social Affairs64%
Confidence: 64%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "employment"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Social Affairs
Economy & Finance63%
Confidence: 63%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "economic policy"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Economy & Finance
Vote ID 188619Source: official EP roll-call records
51
/ 100

Importance Score

Medium importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Some political group division
  • Some national delegation divergence
  • Very close result
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+6 / 15
Turnout+5 / 5
Vote type+0 / 25
Close vote+12 / 15
Legislative+0 / 15
Rebel votes+10 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+8 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026”. S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, Left and NI voted mostly in favour, while EPP, ECR, PfE and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a narrow margin (287 for, 278 against, 49 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions. The outcome was close, which makes individual choices and absences especially consequential.

Result analysis

For
287
Against
278
Abstain
49
Margin of victory
9 votes
Turnout (cast)
614
Absent
104
Participation rate
85.5%
⚠️This was a close vote — the margin was small relative to the votes cast.

Close vote analysis

The margin was 9 votes. 104 MEPs did not vote.

Could absences have changed the outcome? The number of absent MEPs (104) was larger than the 9-vote margin, so absences were numerically significant.

Groups whose absences exceeded the margin

  • EPPhad 26 absent MEPs (margin was 9)
  • PfEhad 24 absent MEPs (margin was 9)
  • S&Dhad 19 absent MEPs (margin was 9)

Countries whose absences exceeded the margin

France (22 absent)Spain (17 absent)Hungary (14 absent)

Absences larger than the margin are numerically significant but do NOT imply the outcome would have changed. That would require modelling how each absent member would have voted, which this analysis does not do.

By political group

EPP184 MEPs
For 6Against 144Abstain 8Absent 26
S&D135 MEPs
For 116Against 0Abstain 0Absent 19
ECR82 MEPs
For 2Against 68Abstain 3Absent 9
Renew78 MEPs
For 55Against 11Abstain 4Absent 8
PfE84 MEPs
For 0Against 33Abstain 27Absent 24
Greens/EFA53 MEPs
For 47Against 0Abstain 0Absent 6
The Left45 MEPs
For 43Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
NI29 MEPs
For 17Against 4Abstain 3Absent 5
ESN27 MEPs
For 1Against 18Abstain 3Absent 5

Country angle

Most in favour
  • France34
  • Belgium14
  • Netherlands14
  • Portugal12
  • Sweden12
Most against
  • Germany43
  • Poland37
  • Italy36
  • Spain25
  • Romania16
Divided delegations
  • Austria
  • Bulgaria
  • Croatia
  • Estonia
  • Finland
  • Germany
  • Greece
  • Italy
Full breakdown by all countries
Austria20 MEPs
For 9Against 11Abstain 0Absent 0
Belgium22 MEPs
For 14Against 2Abstain 5Absent 1
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 5Against 8Abstain 1Absent 3
Croatia12 MEPs
For 5Against 6Abstain 0Absent 1
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 3Against 1Abstain 0Absent 2
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 3Against 15Abstain 1Absent 2
Denmark15 MEPs
For 9Against 2Abstain 4Absent 0
Estonia7 MEPs
For 3Against 3Abstain 0Absent 1
Finland15 MEPs
For 8Against 7Abstain 0Absent 0
France81 MEPs
For 34Against 7Abstain 18Absent 22
Germany95 MEPs
For 41Against 43Abstain 4Absent 7
Greece21 MEPs
For 8Against 8Abstain 3Absent 2
Hungary21 MEPs
For 2Against 4Abstain 1Absent 14
Ireland14 MEPs
For 9Against 2Abstain 0Absent 3
Italy76 MEPs
For 34Against 36Abstain 0Absent 6
Latvia9 MEPs
For 3Against 5Abstain 1Absent 0
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 5Against 6Abstain 0Absent 0
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 3Against 3Abstain 0Absent 0
Malta6 MEPs
For 3Against 2Abstain 0Absent 1
Netherlands31 MEPs
For 14Against 14Abstain 0Absent 3
Poland53 MEPs
For 5Against 37Abstain 2Absent 9
Portugal21 MEPs
For 12Against 1Abstain 8Absent 0
Romania33 MEPs
For 12Against 16Abstain 1Absent 4
Slovakia15 MEPs
For 10Against 2Abstain 0Absent 3
Slovenia9 MEPs
For 3Against 5Abstain 0Absent 1
Spain60 MEPs
For 18Against 25Abstain 0Absent 17
Sweden21 MEPs
For 12Against 7Abstain 0Absent 2

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share