EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2026-03-26

Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application ***I

Institutional Affairs61%
Confidence: 61%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "european parliament"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Institutional Affairs
Vote ID 189578Source: official EP roll-call records
55
/ 100

Importance Score

Medium importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Some political group division
  • Some national delegation divergence
  • Very close result
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+5 / 15
Turnout+5 / 5
Vote type+0 / 25
Close vote+15 / 15
Legislative+0 / 15
Rebel votes+10 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+10 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 as regards the extension of its period of application ***I”. S&D, ECR, Renew, Left, ESN and NI voted mostly in favour, while EPP, PfE and Greens-EFA voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a narrow margin (304 for, 306 against, 28 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions. The outcome was close, which makes individual choices and absences especially consequential.

Result analysis

For
304
Against
306
Abstain
28
Margin of victory
2 votes
Turnout (cast)
638
Absent
80
Participation rate
88.9%
⚠️This was a close vote — the margin was small relative to the votes cast.

Close vote analysis

The margin was 2 votes. 80 MEPs did not vote.

Could absences have changed the outcome? The number of absent MEPs (80) was larger than the 2-vote margin, so absences were numerically significant.

Groups whose absences exceeded the margin

  • S&Dhad 27 absent MEPs (margin was 2)
  • EPPhad 19 absent MEPs (margin was 2)
  • Renewhad 9 absent MEPs (margin was 2)
  • Lefthad 8 absent MEPs (margin was 2)
  • ECRhad 6 absent MEPs (margin was 2)
  • Greens-EFAhad 5 absent MEPs (margin was 2)
  • NIhad 4 absent MEPs (margin was 2)

Countries whose absences exceeded the margin

Hungary (10 absent)France (8 absent)Italy (7 absent)Spain (7 absent)Bulgaria (6 absent)Germany (6 absent)Ireland (5 absent)Poland (5 absent)Croatia (4 absent)Greece (4 absent)Sweden (3 absent)

Absences larger than the margin are numerically significant but do NOT imply the outcome would have changed. That would require modelling how each absent member would have voted, which this analysis does not do.

By political group

EPP184 MEPs
For 3Against 158Abstain 4Absent 19
S&D135 MEPs
For 98Against 9Abstain 1Absent 27
PfE84 MEPs
For 29Against 50Abstain 3Absent 2
ECR82 MEPs
For 42Against 23Abstain 11Absent 6
Renew78 MEPs
For 65Against 4Abstain 0Absent 9
Greens/EFA53 MEPs
For 3Against 45Abstain 0Absent 5
The Left45 MEPs
For 28Against 9Abstain 0Absent 8
ESN27 MEPs
For 18Against 4Abstain 5Absent 0
NI29 MEPs
For 18Against 3Abstain 4Absent 4

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Italy42
  • Spain28
  • Czech Republic14
  • Netherlands14
  • Sweden13
Most against
  • Germany45
  • Poland44
  • France39
  • Romania15
  • Austria13
Divided delegations
  • Belgium
  • Cyprus
  • Denmark
  • Estonia
  • Finland
  • France
  • Germany
  • Greece
Full breakdown by all countries
Austria20 MEPs
For 6Against 13Abstain 0Absent 1
Belgium22 MEPs
For 8Against 7Abstain 6Absent 1
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 7Against 2Abstain 2Absent 6
Croatia12 MEPs
For 0Against 8Abstain 0Absent 4
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 2Against 2Abstain 1Absent 1
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 14Against 5Abstain 2Absent 0
Denmark15 MEPs
For 7Against 8Abstain 0Absent 0
Estonia7 MEPs
For 4Against 3Abstain 0Absent 0
Finland15 MEPs
For 7Against 5Abstain 1Absent 2
France81 MEPs
For 33Against 39Abstain 1Absent 8
Germany95 MEPs
For 44Against 45Abstain 0Absent 6
Greece21 MEPs
For 7Against 8Abstain 2Absent 4
Hungary21 MEPs
For 10Against 1Abstain 0Absent 10
Ireland14 MEPs
For 6Against 3Abstain 0Absent 5
Italy76 MEPs
For 42Against 25Abstain 2Absent 7
Latvia9 MEPs
For 2Against 4Abstain 2Absent 1
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 5Against 5Abstain 0Absent 1
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 2Against 3Abstain 0Absent 1
Malta6 MEPs
For 3Against 2Abstain 0Absent 1
Netherlands31 MEPs
For 14Against 13Abstain 3Absent 1
Poland53 MEPs
For 4Against 44Abstain 0Absent 5
Portugal21 MEPs
For 10Against 10Abstain 0Absent 1
Romania33 MEPs
For 14Against 15Abstain 3Absent 1
Slovakia15 MEPs
For 10Against 1Abstain 2Absent 2
Slovenia9 MEPs
For 2Against 6Abstain 0Absent 1
Spain60 MEPs
For 28Against 24Abstain 1Absent 7
Sweden21 MEPs
For 13Against 5Abstain 0Absent 3

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share