Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): Union framework for the national calculation of life-cycle global warming potential
Importance Score
High importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Main vote
- ✓Legislative procedure
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Some MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): Union framework for the national calculation of life-cycle global warming potential”. PfE, ECR, ESN and NI voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (208 for, 414 against, 10 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- France38
- Czech Republic15
- Hungary11
- Slovakia7
- Slovenia4
- Germany66
- Spain44
- Italy34
- Poland25
- Romania23
- France
- Italy
- Latvia
- Poland
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…