How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?
Agriculture98%★
- title/description contains "farmers"
- title/description contains "livestock"
- title/description contains "food security"
- title/description contains "animal disease"
Health65%
- title/description contains "disease"
Importance Score
Key voteWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Main vote
- ✓Legislative procedure
- ✓High-interest topic: Agriculture
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?”. EPP, S&D, ECR, PfE, Renew, NI and ESN voted mostly in favour, while Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (426 for, 119 against, 40 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- France56
- Italy51
- Germany49
- Poland45
- Spain41
- Sweden10
- Denmark8
- Austria
- Belgium
- Denmark
- Finland
- Germany
- Netherlands
- Slovakia
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…