Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III
Budget66%★
- title/description contains "budget"
Importance Score
High importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Resolution / budget vote
- ✓Budget-related
- ✓High-interest topic: Budget
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section III”. PfE, ECR, ESN and NI voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (228 for, 404 against, 17 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- France38
- Czech Republic16
- Greece10
- Denmark9
- Hungary9
- Germany66
- Spain46
- Italy41
- Poland24
- Romania20
- Denmark
- France
- Greece
- Italy
- Netherlands
- Poland
- Slovakia
- Sweden
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…