The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report
Rule of Law65%★
- title/description contains "rule of law"
Importance Score
High importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Procedural or paragraph vote
- ✓High-interest topic: Rule Of Law
- ✓Very fragmented political vote
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, Left and NI voted mostly in favour, while ECR voted mostly against. PfE and ESN mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (375 for, 130 against, 114 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a procedural vote — it concerns how Parliament organises its work rather than a substantive policy decision. It is generally of lower public-interest weight, though procedural votes can still signal political alignments.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany51
- Poland26
- Spain25
- Netherlands21
- Greece19
- France38
- Italy25
- France
- Italy
- Poland
- Slovenia
- Spain
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…