The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report
Rule of Law65%★
- title/description contains "rule of law"
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Procedural or paragraph vote
- ✓High-interest topic: Rule Of Law
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Some MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report”. ECR, PfE and ESN voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly against. NI mostly abstained. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (181 for, 419 against, 22 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a procedural vote — it concerns how Parliament organises its work rather than a substantive policy decision. It is generally of lower public-interest weight, though procedural votes can still signal political alignments.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Czech Republic14
- Hungary8
- Latvia4
- Germany62
- Spain44
- France41
- Italy34
- Poland24
- France
- Hungary
- Italy
- Latvia
- Poland
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…