The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report
Rule of Law65%★
- title/description contains "rule of law"
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Procedural or paragraph vote
- ✓High-interest topic: Rule Of Law
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓Close result
- ✓High participation
- ✓Some MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report”. S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly in favour, while EPP, ECR, PfE, ESN and NI voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (284 for, 335 against, 6 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a procedural vote — it concerns how Parliament organises its work rather than a substantive policy decision. It is generally of lower public-interest weight, though procedural votes can still signal political alignments.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany42
- France37
- Spain28
- Netherlands15
- Belgium12
- Poland41
- Italy36
- Czech Republic17
- Romania16
- Hungary13
- Austria
- Belgium
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Estonia
- France
- Germany
- Greece
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…