Market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sector ***I
Transport64%★
- title/description contains "transport"
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Market stability reserve for the buildings, road transport and additional sector ***I”. ECR, PfE, ESN and NI voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (236 for, 400 against, 4 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Poland42
- France37
- Czech Republic13
- Slovakia9
- Hungary8
- Germany62
- Spain45
- Italy37
- Netherlands19
- Portugal19
- Bulgaria
- France
- Greece
- Hungary
- Italy
- Latvia
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…