How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?
Agriculture98%★
- title/description contains "farmers"
- title/description contains "livestock"
- title/description contains "food security"
- title/description contains "animal disease"
Health65%
- title/description contains "disease"
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓High-interest topic: Agriculture
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓Close result
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases?”. PfE, Greens-EFA, Left and NI voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, ECR, Renew and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (244 for, 297 against, 41 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- France61
- Netherlands19
- Belgium14
- Austria13
- Hungary11
- Italy50
- Germany48
- Poland41
- Spain39
- Romania15
- Denmark
- Finland
- Germany
- Greece
- Latvia
- Luxembourg
- Sweden
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…