The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Very fragmented political vote
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment”. EPP, S&D, PfE, Renew and NI voted mostly in favour, while Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly against. ECR and ESN mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (330 for, 111 against, 117 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- France55
- Germany36
- Spain36
- Poland27
- Romania16
- Netherlands12
- Czech Republic11
- Latvia2
- Belgium
- Czech Republic
- Denmark
- Estonia
- Germany
- Slovakia
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…