EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2026-04-30

Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti

Security84%
Confidence: 84%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "trafficking"
  • title/description contains "criminal groups"
Reviewed: yes
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Security
Foreign Affairs75%
Confidence: 75%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title contains non-EU country "haiti"
Reviewed: yes
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Foreign Affairs
Vote ID 192354Source: official EP roll-call records
22
/ 100

Importance Score

Low importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Some political group division
  • High participation
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+8 / 15
Turnout+4 / 5
Vote type+0 / 25
Close vote+0 / 15
Legislative+0 / 15
Rebel votes+0 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+0 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti”. Greens-EFA, Left and NI voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, ECR, Renew, PfE and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (84 for, 464 against, 11 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.

Result analysis

For
84
Against
464
Abstain
11
Margin of victory
380 votes
Turnout (cast)
559
Absent
160
Participation rate
77.8%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP185 MEPs
For 0Against 133Abstain 1Absent 51
S&D135 MEPs
For 2Against 107Abstain 0Absent 26
ECR82 MEPs
For 0Against 69Abstain 0Absent 13
Renew78 MEPs
For 0Against 66Abstain 0Absent 12
PfE85 MEPs
For 0Against 64Abstain 0Absent 21
Greens/EFA53 MEPs
For 43Against 0Abstain 1Absent 9
The Left45 MEPs
For 27Against 0Abstain 0Absent 18
NI29 MEPs
For 10Against 7Abstain 8Absent 4
ESN27 MEPs
For 2Against 18Abstain 1Absent 6

Country angle

Most in favour

None.

Most against
  • France61
  • Germany54
  • Italy49
  • Poland47
  • Spain42
Divided delegations
  • Finland
Full breakdown by all countries
Austria20 MEPs
For 2Against 15Abstain 0Absent 3
Belgium22 MEPs
For 5Against 15Abstain 0Absent 2
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 1Against 10Abstain 0Absent 6
Croatia12 MEPs
For 1Against 6Abstain 0Absent 5
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 0Against 1Abstain 0Absent 5
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 1Against 16Abstain 2Absent 2
Denmark15 MEPs
For 4Against 10Abstain 0Absent 1
Estonia7 MEPs
For 0Against 6Abstain 0Absent 1
Finland15 MEPs
For 4Against 7Abstain 0Absent 4
France81 MEPs
For 3Against 61Abstain 0Absent 17
Germany96 MEPs
For 21Against 54Abstain 2Absent 19
Greece21 MEPs
For 3Against 8Abstain 0Absent 10
Hungary21 MEPs
For 0Against 5Abstain 0Absent 16
Ireland14 MEPs
For 3Against 10Abstain 0Absent 1
Italy76 MEPs
For 12Against 49Abstain 0Absent 15
Latvia9 MEPs
For 0Against 3Abstain 1Absent 5
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 0Against 10Abstain 0Absent 1
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 1Against 5Abstain 0Absent 0
Malta6 MEPs
For 0Against 0Abstain 0Absent 6
Netherlands31 MEPs
For 7Against 21Abstain 0Absent 3
Poland53 MEPs
For 0Against 47Abstain 1Absent 5
Portugal21 MEPs
For 2Against 15Abstain 0Absent 4
Romania33 MEPs
For 0Against 21Abstain 1Absent 11
Slovakia15 MEPs
For 3Against 6Abstain 4Absent 2
Slovenia9 MEPs
For 1Against 7Abstain 0Absent 1
Spain60 MEPs
For 6Against 42Abstain 0Absent 12
Sweden21 MEPs
For 4Against 14Abstain 0Absent 3

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share