EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2026-04-30

Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti

Security84%
Confidence: 84%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "trafficking"
  • title/description contains "criminal groups"
Reviewed: yes
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Security
Foreign Affairs75%
Confidence: 75%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title contains non-EU country "haiti"
Reviewed: yes
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Foreign Affairs
Vote ID 192359Source: official EP roll-call records
34
/ 100

Importance Score

Low importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Some political group division
  • Some national delegation divergence
  • High participation
  • Some MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+8 / 15
Turnout+4 / 5
Vote type+0 / 25
Close vote+0 / 15
Legislative+0 / 15
Rebel votes+4 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+8 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly in favour, while ECR, PfE, NI and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (370 for, 180 against, 19 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.

Result analysis

For
370
Against
180
Abstain
19
Margin of victory
190 votes
Turnout (cast)
569
Absent
150
Participation rate
79.1%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP185 MEPs
For 129Against 8Abstain 0Absent 48
S&D135 MEPs
For 104Against 0Abstain 7Absent 24
ECR82 MEPs
For 0Against 68Abstain 1Absent 13
Renew78 MEPs
For 61Against 5Abstain 0Absent 12
PfE85 MEPs
For 0Against 64Abstain 0Absent 21
Greens/EFA53 MEPs
For 43Against 2Abstain 0Absent 8
The Left45 MEPs
For 27Against 0Abstain 0Absent 18
NI29 MEPs
For 6Against 10Abstain 10Absent 3
ESN27 MEPs
For 0Against 23Abstain 1Absent 3

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Germany58
  • Spain44
  • Italy34
  • France32
  • Poland25
Most against
  • Czech Republic13
  • Sweden8
Divided delegations
  • Austria
  • France
  • Greece
  • Italy
  • Latvia
  • Netherlands
  • Poland
  • Slovakia
Full breakdown by all countries
Austria20 MEPs
For 11Against 6Abstain 0Absent 3
Belgium22 MEPs
For 14Against 6Abstain 0Absent 2
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 9Against 3Abstain 0Absent 5
Croatia12 MEPs
For 5Against 1Abstain 0Absent 6
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 1Against 0Abstain 0Absent 5
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 6Against 13Abstain 1Absent 1
Denmark15 MEPs
For 9Against 3Abstain 2Absent 1
Estonia7 MEPs
For 6Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Finland15 MEPs
For 11Against 0Abstain 0Absent 4
France81 MEPs
For 32Against 32Abstain 0Absent 17
Germany96 MEPs
For 58Against 18Abstain 6Absent 14
Greece21 MEPs
For 7Against 4Abstain 0Absent 10
Hungary21 MEPs
For 6Against 0Abstain 0Absent 15
Ireland14 MEPs
For 12Against 1Abstain 0Absent 1
Italy76 MEPs
For 34Against 27Abstain 0Absent 15
Latvia9 MEPs
For 2Against 2Abstain 0Absent 5
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 8Against 3Abstain 0Absent 0
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 5Against 1Abstain 0Absent 0
Malta6 MEPs
For 0Against 0Abstain 0Absent 6
Netherlands31 MEPs
For 17Against 10Abstain 1Absent 3
Poland53 MEPs
For 25Against 23Abstain 1Absent 4
Portugal21 MEPs
For 15Against 2Abstain 0Absent 4
Romania33 MEPs
For 16Against 5Abstain 1Absent 11
Slovakia15 MEPs
For 6Against 5Abstain 2Absent 2
Slovenia9 MEPs
For 6Against 2Abstain 0Absent 1
Spain60 MEPs
For 44Against 5Abstain 0Absent 11
Sweden21 MEPs
For 5Against 8Abstain 5Absent 3

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share