EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2026-04-30

Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti

Security84%
Confidence: 84%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "trafficking"
  • title/description contains "criminal groups"
Reviewed: yes
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Security
Foreign Affairs75%
Confidence: 75%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title contains non-EU country "haiti"
Reviewed: yes
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Foreign Affairs
Vote ID 192360Source: official EP roll-call records
31
/ 100

Importance Score

Low importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Strong political group division
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+8 / 15
Turnout+4 / 5
Vote type+0 / 25
Close vote+0 / 15
Legislative+0 / 15
Rebel votes+7 / 10
Group division+12 / 15
Country division+0 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti”. Greens-EFA, Left and NI voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, ECR and Renew voted mostly against. PfE and ESN mostly abstained. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (86 for, 415 against, 66 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.

Result analysis

For
86
Against
415
Abstain
66
Margin of victory
329 votes
Turnout (cast)
567
Absent
152
Participation rate
78.9%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP185 MEPs
For 0Against 138Abstain 0Absent 47
S&D135 MEPs
For 2Against 108Abstain 0Absent 25
ECR82 MEPs
For 0Against 65Abstain 4Absent 13
Renew78 MEPs
For 0Against 65Abstain 0Absent 13
PfE85 MEPs
For 0Against 30Abstain 33Absent 22
Greens/EFA53 MEPs
For 39Against 4Abstain 2Absent 8
The Left45 MEPs
For 27Against 0Abstain 0Absent 18
NI29 MEPs
For 17Against 2Abstain 7Absent 3
ESN27 MEPs
For 1Against 3Abstain 20Absent 3

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Slovakia6
Most against
  • Italy50
  • Poland47
  • Spain45
  • Germany44
  • France33
Divided delegations
  • Finland
  • Greece
  • Slovakia
Full breakdown by all countries
Austria20 MEPs
For 2Against 9Abstain 6Absent 3
Belgium22 MEPs
For 5Against 13Abstain 2Absent 2
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 0Against 10Abstain 2Absent 5
Croatia12 MEPs
For 1Against 6Abstain 0Absent 5
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 0Against 1Abstain 0Absent 5
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 4Against 15Abstain 0Absent 2
Denmark15 MEPs
For 4Against 10Abstain 0Absent 1
Estonia7 MEPs
For 0Against 6Abstain 0Absent 1
Finland15 MEPs
For 4Against 7Abstain 0Absent 4
France81 MEPs
For 2Against 33Abstain 29Absent 17
Germany96 MEPs
For 22Against 44Abstain 15Absent 15
Greece21 MEPs
For 3Against 5Abstain 3Absent 10
Hungary21 MEPs
For 0Against 6Abstain 0Absent 15
Ireland14 MEPs
For 3Against 10Abstain 0Absent 1
Italy76 MEPs
For 10Against 50Abstain 0Absent 16
Latvia9 MEPs
For 0Against 3Abstain 1Absent 5
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 1Against 8Abstain 2Absent 0
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 1Against 4Abstain 1Absent 0
Malta6 MEPs
For 0Against 0Abstain 0Absent 6
Netherlands31 MEPs
For 7Against 21Abstain 0Absent 3
Poland53 MEPs
For 0Against 47Abstain 2Absent 4
Portugal21 MEPs
For 2Against 15Abstain 0Absent 4
Romania33 MEPs
For 0Against 21Abstain 1Absent 11
Slovakia15 MEPs
For 6Against 5Abstain 2Absent 2
Slovenia9 MEPs
For 1Against 7Abstain 0Absent 1
Spain60 MEPs
For 4Against 45Abstain 0Absent 11
Sweden21 MEPs
For 4Against 14Abstain 0Absent 3

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share