EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2026-04-30

Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti

Security84%
Confidence: 84%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "trafficking"
  • title/description contains "criminal groups"
Reviewed: yes
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Security
Foreign Affairs75%
Confidence: 75%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title contains non-EU country "haiti"
Reviewed: yes
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Foreign Affairs
Vote ID 192361Source: official EP roll-call records
69
/ 100

Importance Score

High importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Main vote
  • Legislative procedure
  • Some political group division
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+8 / 15
Turnout+4 / 5
Vote type+25 / 25
Close vote+0 / 15
Legislative+15 / 15
Rebel votes+7 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+0 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti”. EPP, S&D, ECR, Renew, PfE, Greens-EFA, Left and NI voted mostly in favour. ESN mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (511 for, 21 against, 42 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.

Result analysis

For
511
Against
21
Abstain
42
Margin of victory
490 votes
Turnout (cast)
574
Absent
145
Participation rate
79.8%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP185 MEPs
For 139Against 0Abstain 0Absent 46
S&D135 MEPs
For 111Against 0Abstain 0Absent 24
ECR82 MEPs
For 63Against 6Abstain 1Absent 12
Renew78 MEPs
For 66Against 0Abstain 0Absent 12
PfE85 MEPs
For 45Against 13Abstain 7Absent 20
Greens/EFA53 MEPs
For 45Against 0Abstain 0Absent 8
The Left45 MEPs
For 28Against 0Abstain 0Absent 17
NI29 MEPs
For 13Against 0Abstain 13Absent 3
ESN27 MEPs
For 1Against 2Abstain 21Absent 3

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Italy62
  • France61
  • Germany61
  • Poland46
  • Spain45
Most against

None.

Divided delegations

None notably divided.

Full breakdown by all countries
Austria20 MEPs
For 11Against 0Abstain 6Absent 3
Belgium22 MEPs
For 17Against 3Abstain 0Absent 2
Bulgaria17 MEPs
For 10Against 0Abstain 2Absent 5
Croatia12 MEPs
For 7Against 0Abstain 0Absent 5
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 1Against 0Abstain 0Absent 5
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 19Against 0Abstain 1Absent 1
Denmark15 MEPs
For 12Against 1Abstain 1Absent 1
Estonia7 MEPs
For 6Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Finland15 MEPs
For 11Against 0Abstain 0Absent 4
France81 MEPs
For 61Against 2Abstain 2Absent 16
Germany96 MEPs
For 61Against 0Abstain 22Absent 13
Greece21 MEPs
For 9Against 0Abstain 2Absent 10
Hungary21 MEPs
For 6Against 0Abstain 0Absent 15
Ireland14 MEPs
For 13Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Italy76 MEPs
For 62Against 0Abstain 0Absent 14
Latvia9 MEPs
For 4Against 0Abstain 0Absent 5
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 10Against 0Abstain 1Absent 0
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 6Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Malta6 MEPs
For 0Against 0Abstain 0Absent 6
Netherlands31 MEPs
For 22Against 6Abstain 0Absent 3
Poland53 MEPs
For 46Against 2Abstain 1Absent 4
Portugal21 MEPs
For 17Against 0Abstain 0Absent 4
Romania33 MEPs
For 22Against 0Abstain 1Absent 10
Slovakia15 MEPs
For 10Against 0Abstain 3Absent 2
Slovenia9 MEPs
For 8Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Spain60 MEPs
For 45Against 4Abstain 0Absent 11
Sweden21 MEPs
For 15Against 3Abstain 0Absent 3

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share