Shortcomings and deficiencies of the ‘Amnesty Law’ in Venezuela
Foreign Affairs75%★
- title contains non-EU country "venezuela"
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Shortcomings and deficiencies of the ‘Amnesty Law’ in Venezuela”. S&D and Greens-EFA voted mostly in favour, while EPP, ECR, Renew, PfE and ESN voted mostly against. Left and NI mostly abstained. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (157 for, 329 against, 69 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- France29
- Portugal7
- Austria6
- Finland6
- Croatia4
- Germany53
- Poland39
- Italy35
- Spain23
- Netherlands18
- Finland
- France
- Italy
- Portugal
- Spain
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…