The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward
Importance Score
Medium importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓Significant national delegation divergence
- ✓Close result
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward”. PfE, ECR and ESN voted mostly in favour, while S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, Left and NI voted mostly against. EPP mostly abstained. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (208 for, 264 against, 94 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Poland41
- France35
- Spain23
- Czech Republic12
- Hungary9
- Germany46
- Italy30
- Sweden18
- Netherlands15
- Denmark11
- Austria
- Bulgaria
- France
- Greece
- Italy
- Latvia
- Romania
- Spain
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…