The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forward”. S&D, Greens-EFA, Left and NI voted mostly in favour, while EPP, PfE, Renew, ECR and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (226 for, 296 against, 46 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Italy28
- Sweden10
- Denmark8
- Slovakia7
- Finland6
- Germany47
- Poland24
- Spain24
- Netherlands15
- Romania15
- Austria
- Belgium
- Croatia
- Denmark
- Finland
- France
- Germany
- Greece
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…