Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Very fragmented political vote
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap”. EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, Left and NI voted mostly in favour, while PfE, ECR and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (320 for, 152 against, 34 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- France57
- Germany46
- Netherlands16
- Sweden16
- Romania14
- Poland24
- Spain21
- Italy17
- Austria10
- Slovenia5
- Austria
- Croatia
- Germany
- Greece
- Hungary
- Italy
- Lithuania
- Poland
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…