EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2026-06-16

Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America ***I

Trade86%
Confidence: 86%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "tariff"
  • title/description contains "customs"
Reviewed: yes
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Trade
Foreign Affairs75%
Confidence: 75%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title contains non-EU country "united states"
Reviewed: yes
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Foreign Affairs
Vote ID 193973Source: official EP roll-call records
33
/ 100

Importance Score

Low importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Some political group division
  • Some national delegation divergence
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+0 / 15
Turnout+5 / 5
Vote type+0 / 25
Close vote+0 / 15
Legislative+0 / 15
Rebel votes+10 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+8 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Adjustment of customs duties and opening of tariff quotas for the import of certain goods originating in the United States of America ***I”. Left and NI voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, PfE, ECR, Renew, Greens-EFA and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (120 for, 509 against, 5 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.

Result analysis

For
120
Against
509
Abstain
5
Margin of victory
389 votes
Turnout (cast)
634
Absent
78
Participation rate
89.0%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP181 MEPs
For 0Against 164Abstain 0Absent 17
S&D135 MEPs
For 14Against 108Abstain 0Absent 13
PfE85 MEPs
For 33Against 45Abstain 0Absent 7
ECR82 MEPs
For 5Against 66Abstain 1Absent 10
Renew77 MEPs
For 1Against 67Abstain 0Absent 9
Greens/EFA51 MEPs
For 12Against 29Abstain 2Absent 8
The Left45 MEPs
For 39Against 1Abstain 0Absent 5
NI29 MEPs
For 15Against 8Abstain 2Absent 4
ESN27 MEPs
For 1Against 21Abstain 0Absent 5

Country angle

Most in favour
  • France55
Most against
  • Germany76
  • Italy58
  • Spain51
  • Poland47
  • Netherlands28
Divided delegations

None notably divided.

Full breakdown by all countries
Austria19 MEPs
For 5Against 10Abstain 2Absent 2
Belgium22 MEPs
For 5Against 15Abstain 0Absent 2
Bulgaria16 MEPs
For 0Against 15Abstain 0Absent 1
Croatia12 MEPs
For 1Against 11Abstain 0Absent 0
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 1Against 4Abstain 0Absent 1
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 0Against 19Abstain 0Absent 2
Denmark15 MEPs
For 2Against 11Abstain 0Absent 2
Estonia7 MEPs
For 0Against 6Abstain 0Absent 1
Finland15 MEPs
For 4Against 10Abstain 0Absent 1
France80 MEPs
For 55Against 17Abstain 1Absent 7
Germany95 MEPs
For 10Against 76Abstain 0Absent 9
Greece21 MEPs
For 5Against 11Abstain 1Absent 4
Hungary20 MEPs
For 0Against 11Abstain 0Absent 9
Ireland14 MEPs
For 3Against 9Abstain 0Absent 2
Italy76 MEPs
For 13Against 58Abstain 0Absent 5
Latvia9 MEPs
For 0Against 9Abstain 0Absent 0
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 0Against 8Abstain 0Absent 3
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 1Against 5Abstain 0Absent 0
Malta5 MEPs
For 0Against 5Abstain 0Absent 0
Netherlands30 MEPs
For 1Against 28Abstain 0Absent 1
Poland53 MEPs
For 1Against 47Abstain 0Absent 5
Portugal21 MEPs
For 1Against 16Abstain 0Absent 4
Romania33 MEPs
For 0Against 26Abstain 1Absent 6
Slovakia15 MEPs
For 2Against 12Abstain 0Absent 1
Slovenia9 MEPs
For 1Against 5Abstain 0Absent 3
Spain60 MEPs
For 4Against 51Abstain 0Absent 5
Sweden21 MEPs
For 5Against 14Abstain 0Absent 2

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share