EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2026-06-17

Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) *

Vote ID 194129Source: official EP roll-call records
43
/ 100

Importance Score

Medium importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Some political group division
  • Significant national delegation divergence
  • Close result
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+0 / 15
Turnout+5 / 5
Vote type+0 / 25
Close vote+6 / 15
Legislative+0 / 15
Rebel votes+10 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+12 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Structure and rates of excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related products (recast) *”. S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly in favour, while EPP, ECR, PfE, NI and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (281 for, 315 against, 62 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.

Result analysis

For
281
Against
315
Abstain
62
Margin of victory
34 votes
Turnout (cast)
658
Absent
52
Participation rate
92.7%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP181 MEPs
For 21Against 147Abstain 1Absent 12
S&D135 MEPs
For 117Against 2Abstain 5Absent 11
ECR82 MEPs
For 2Against 72Abstain 4Absent 4
PfE84 MEPs
For 0Against 47Abstain 29Absent 8
Renew77 MEPs
For 66Against 1Abstain 4Absent 6
Greens/EFA51 MEPs
For 46Against 0Abstain 0Absent 5
The Left44 MEPs
For 23Against 5Abstain 14Absent 2
NI29 MEPs
For 4Against 20Abstain 4Absent 1
ESN27 MEPs
For 2Against 21Abstain 1Absent 3

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Netherlands21
  • Belgium14
  • Finland13
  • Denmark12
  • Ireland12
Most against
  • Poland46
  • Germany45
  • Italy36
  • Spain30
  • Romania17
Divided delegations
  • Austria
  • Croatia
  • Estonia
  • Germany
  • Greece
  • Italy
  • Luxembourg
  • Malta
Full breakdown by all countries
Austria19 MEPs
For 8Against 10Abstain 0Absent 1
Belgium22 MEPs
For 14Against 3Abstain 4Absent 1
Bulgaria16 MEPs
For 2Against 10Abstain 3Absent 1
Croatia12 MEPs
For 5Against 6Abstain 0Absent 1
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 0Against 4Abstain 2Absent 0
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 4Against 16Abstain 0Absent 1
Denmark15 MEPs
For 12Against 3Abstain 0Absent 0
Estonia7 MEPs
For 3Against 3Abstain 0Absent 1
Finland15 MEPs
For 13Against 1Abstain 0Absent 1
France80 MEPs
For 28Against 10Abstain 38Absent 4
Germany95 MEPs
For 37Against 45Abstain 4Absent 9
Greece21 MEPs
For 6Against 11Abstain 3Absent 1
Hungary20 MEPs
For 1Against 13Abstain 2Absent 4
Ireland14 MEPs
For 12Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Italy74 MEPs
For 32Against 36Abstain 0Absent 6
Latvia9 MEPs
For 3Against 6Abstain 0Absent 0
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 6Against 3Abstain 0Absent 2
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 3Against 3Abstain 0Absent 0
Malta5 MEPs
For 3Against 2Abstain 0Absent 0
Netherlands30 MEPs
For 21Against 9Abstain 0Absent 0
Poland53 MEPs
For 3Against 46Abstain 0Absent 4
Portugal21 MEPs
For 8Against 10Abstain 1Absent 2
Romania33 MEPs
For 7Against 17Abstain 5Absent 4
Slovakia15 MEPs
For 9Against 5Abstain 0Absent 1
Slovenia9 MEPs
For 4Against 3Abstain 0Absent 2
Spain60 MEPs
For 26Against 30Abstain 0Absent 4
Sweden21 MEPs
For 11Against 10Abstain 0Absent 0

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share