EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2026-06-18

Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines

Health65%
Confidence: 65%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "medicine"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Health
Environment65%
Confidence: 65%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "waste"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Environment
Vote ID 194460Source: official EP roll-call records
40
/ 100

Importance Score

Medium importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Some political group division
  • Some national delegation divergence
  • Close result
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+0 / 15
Turnout+5 / 5
Vote type+0 / 25
Close vote+10 / 15
Legislative+0 / 15
Rebel votes+7 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+8 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Implementation of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD) and risks to the security of supply of medicines”. EPP, PfE, ECR, NI and ESN voted mostly in favour, while S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a narrow margin (288 for, 263 against, 14 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions. The outcome was close, which makes individual choices and absences especially consequential.

Result analysis

For
288
Against
263
Abstain
14
Margin of victory
25 votes
Turnout (cast)
565
Absent
144
Participation rate
79.7%
⚠️This was a close vote — the margin was small relative to the votes cast.

Close vote analysis

The margin was 25 votes. 144 MEPs did not vote.

Could absences have changed the outcome? The number of absent MEPs (144) was larger than the 25-vote margin, so absences were numerically significant.

Groups whose absences exceeded the margin

  • EPPhad 41 absent MEPs (margin was 25)
  • S&Dhad 31 absent MEPs (margin was 25)

Absences larger than the margin are numerically significant but do NOT imply the outcome would have changed. That would require modelling how each absent member would have voted, which this analysis does not do.

By political group

EPP182 MEPs
For 127Against 11Abstain 3Absent 41
S&D135 MEPs
For 1Against 103Abstain 0Absent 31
PfE84 MEPs
For 65Against 0Abstain 0Absent 19
ECR81 MEPs
For 58Against 1Abstain 4Absent 18
Renew76 MEPs
For 0Against 62Abstain 0Absent 14
Greens/EFA51 MEPs
For 0Against 43Abstain 0Absent 8
The Left44 MEPs
For 0Against 38Abstain 0Absent 6
NI29 MEPs
For 14Against 5Abstain 6Absent 4
ESN27 MEPs
For 23Against 0Abstain 1Absent 3

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Germany39
  • Poland38
  • Italy31
  • Spain24
  • Czech Republic14
Most against
  • France32
  • Netherlands21
  • Sweden16
  • Denmark12
  • Belgium10
Divided delegations
  • Austria
  • Croatia
  • Estonia
  • France
  • Germany
  • Greece
  • Italy
  • Latvia
Full breakdown by all countries
Austria19 MEPs
For 10Against 7Abstain 0Absent 2
Belgium22 MEPs
For 5Against 10Abstain 1Absent 6
Bulgaria16 MEPs
For 9Against 4Abstain 0Absent 3
Croatia12 MEPs
For 4Against 4Abstain 0Absent 4
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 1Against 0Abstain 0Absent 5
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 14Against 1Abstain 3Absent 3
Denmark15 MEPs
For 2Against 12Abstain 0Absent 1
Estonia7 MEPs
For 2Against 3Abstain 0Absent 2
Finland15 MEPs
For 2Against 9Abstain 0Absent 4
France79 MEPs
For 25Against 32Abstain 4Absent 18
Germany96 MEPs
For 39Against 35Abstain 5Absent 17
Greece21 MEPs
For 8Against 5Abstain 0Absent 8
Hungary20 MEPs
For 13Against 1Abstain 0Absent 6
Ireland14 MEPs
For 4Against 8Abstain 0Absent 2
Italy73 MEPs
For 31Against 29Abstain 0Absent 13
Latvia9 MEPs
For 5Against 3Abstain 0Absent 1
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 2Against 4Abstain 0Absent 5
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 2Against 3Abstain 0Absent 1
Malta5 MEPs
For 2Against 3Abstain 0Absent 0
Netherlands30 MEPs
For 9Against 21Abstain 0Absent 0
Poland53 MEPs
For 38Against 4Abstain 1Absent 10
Portugal21 MEPs
For 8Against 10Abstain 0Absent 3
Romania33 MEPs
For 14Against 7Abstain 0Absent 12
Slovakia15 MEPs
For 8Against 5Abstain 0Absent 2
Slovenia9 MEPs
For 3Against 4Abstain 0Absent 2
Spain60 MEPs
For 24Against 23Abstain 0Absent 13
Sweden21 MEPs
For 4Against 16Abstain 0Absent 1

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share