EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2026-06-18

Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich

Foreign Affairs75%
Confidence: 75%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title contains non-EU country "belarus"
Reviewed: yes
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Foreign Affairs
Human Rights64%
Confidence: 64%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "political prisoner"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Human Rights
Vote ID 194637Source: official EP roll-call records
22
/ 100

Importance Score

Low importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Some political group division
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+0 / 15
Turnout+5 / 5
Vote type+0 / 25
Close vote+0 / 15
Legislative+0 / 15
Rebel votes+7 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+0 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich”. EPP, S&D, ECR, Renew, PfE, Greens-EFA and ESN voted mostly in favour, while Left and NI voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (488 for, 39 against, 28 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.

Result analysis

For
488
Against
39
Abstain
28
Margin of victory
449 votes
Turnout (cast)
555
Absent
154
Participation rate
78.3%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP182 MEPs
For 141Against 0Abstain 0Absent 41
S&D135 MEPs
For 105Against 0Abstain 0Absent 30
ECR81 MEPs
For 64Against 0Abstain 0Absent 17
Renew76 MEPs
For 59Against 3Abstain 0Absent 14
PfE84 MEPs
For 52Against 0Abstain 6Absent 26
Greens/EFA51 MEPs
For 39Against 1Abstain 0Absent 11
The Left44 MEPs
For 4Against 25Abstain 9Absent 6
ESN27 MEPs
For 18Against 1Abstain 5Absent 3
NI29 MEPs
For 6Against 9Abstain 8Absent 6

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Germany68
  • Italy50
  • France48
  • Spain46
  • Poland43
Most against

None.

Divided delegations

None notably divided.

Full breakdown by all countries
Austria19 MEPs
For 12Against 0Abstain 6Absent 1
Belgium22 MEPs
For 11Against 3Abstain 2Absent 6
Bulgaria16 MEPs
For 12Against 1Abstain 0Absent 3
Croatia12 MEPs
For 9Against 0Abstain 0Absent 3
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 1Against 0Abstain 0Absent 5
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 15Against 2Abstain 1Absent 3
Denmark15 MEPs
For 14Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Estonia7 MEPs
For 5Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Finland15 MEPs
For 8Against 0Abstain 3Absent 4
France79 MEPs
For 48Against 10Abstain 0Absent 21
Germany96 MEPs
For 68Against 7Abstain 3Absent 18
Greece21 MEPs
For 8Against 2Abstain 1Absent 10
Hungary20 MEPs
For 7Against 0Abstain 1Absent 12
Ireland14 MEPs
For 11Against 0Abstain 1Absent 2
Italy73 MEPs
For 50Against 9Abstain 0Absent 14
Latvia9 MEPs
For 8Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 6Against 0Abstain 0Absent 5
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 5Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Malta5 MEPs
For 4Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Netherlands30 MEPs
For 30Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Poland53 MEPs
For 43Against 0Abstain 1Absent 9
Portugal21 MEPs
For 16Against 2Abstain 0Absent 3
Romania33 MEPs
For 20Against 0Abstain 1Absent 12
Slovakia15 MEPs
For 6Against 1Abstain 6Absent 2
Slovenia9 MEPs
For 7Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Spain60 MEPs
For 46Against 2Abstain 0Absent 12
Sweden21 MEPs
For 18Against 0Abstain 2Absent 1

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share