EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2026-06-18

Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich

Foreign Affairs75%
Confidence: 75%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title contains non-EU country "belarus"
Reviewed: yes
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Foreign Affairs
Human Rights64%
Confidence: 64%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "political prisoner"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Human Rights
Vote ID 194641Source: official EP roll-call records
33
/ 100

Importance Score

Low importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Some political group division
  • Some national delegation divergence
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+0 / 15
Turnout+5 / 5
Vote type+0 / 25
Close vote+0 / 15
Legislative+0 / 15
Rebel votes+10 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+8 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich”. PfE, ESN and NI voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, ECR, Renew, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (93 for, 437 against, 22 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.

Result analysis

For
93
Against
437
Abstain
22
Margin of victory
344 votes
Turnout (cast)
552
Absent
157
Participation rate
77.9%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP182 MEPs
For 2Against 138Abstain 0Absent 42
S&D135 MEPs
For 0Against 105Abstain 0Absent 30
ECR81 MEPs
For 12Against 46Abstain 5Absent 18
Renew76 MEPs
For 1Against 61Abstain 0Absent 14
PfE84 MEPs
For 37Against 14Abstain 6Absent 27
Greens/EFA51 MEPs
For 0Against 42Abstain 0Absent 9
The Left44 MEPs
For 1Against 27Abstain 8Absent 8
ESN27 MEPs
For 23Against 0Abstain 1Absent 3
NI29 MEPs
For 17Against 4Abstain 2Absent 6

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Slovakia7
Most against
  • Germany58
  • Spain41
  • Italy39
  • Poland39
  • France35
Divided delegations
  • France
  • Slovakia
Full breakdown by all countries
Austria19 MEPs
For 6Against 12Abstain 0Absent 1
Belgium22 MEPs
For 0Against 15Abstain 0Absent 7
Bulgaria16 MEPs
For 3Against 10Abstain 0Absent 3
Croatia12 MEPs
For 0Against 9Abstain 0Absent 3
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 0Against 0Abstain 1Absent 5
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 4Against 11Abstain 1Absent 5
Denmark15 MEPs
For 0Against 13Abstain 1Absent 1
Estonia7 MEPs
For 0Against 5Abstain 0Absent 2
Finland15 MEPs
For 0Against 11Abstain 0Absent 4
France79 MEPs
For 25Against 35Abstain 0Absent 19
Germany96 MEPs
For 20Against 58Abstain 0Absent 18
Greece21 MEPs
For 3Against 8Abstain 0Absent 10
Hungary20 MEPs
For 1Against 7Abstain 0Absent 12
Ireland14 MEPs
For 1Against 10Abstain 0Absent 3
Italy73 MEPs
For 11Against 39Abstain 8Absent 15
Latvia9 MEPs
For 0Against 8Abstain 0Absent 1
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 0Against 6Abstain 0Absent 5
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 1Against 4Abstain 0Absent 1
Malta5 MEPs
For 0Against 5Abstain 0Absent 0
Netherlands30 MEPs
For 2Against 28Abstain 0Absent 0
Poland53 MEPs
For 6Against 39Abstain 0Absent 8
Portugal21 MEPs
For 1Against 16Abstain 0Absent 4
Romania33 MEPs
For 2Against 17Abstain 1Absent 13
Slovakia15 MEPs
For 7Against 6Abstain 0Absent 2
Slovenia9 MEPs
For 0Against 7Abstain 0Absent 2
Spain60 MEPs
For 0Against 41Abstain 7Absent 12
Sweden21 MEPs
For 0Against 17Abstain 3Absent 1

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share