EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2026-06-18

Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich

Foreign Affairs75%
Confidence: 75%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title contains non-EU country "belarus"
Reviewed: yes
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Foreign Affairs
Human Rights64%
Confidence: 64%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "political prisoner"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Human Rights
Vote ID 194644Source: official EP roll-call records
62
/ 100

Importance Score

High importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Main vote
  • Legislative procedure
  • Some political group division
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+0 / 15
Turnout+5 / 5
Vote type+25 / 25
Close vote+0 / 15
Legislative+15 / 15
Rebel votes+7 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+0 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich”. EPP, S&D, ECR, Renew, PfE, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly in favour. NI and ESN mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (504 for, 4 against, 55 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.

Result analysis

For
504
Against
4
Abstain
55
Margin of victory
500 votes
Turnout (cast)
563
Absent
146
Participation rate
79.4%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP182 MEPs
For 142Against 0Abstain 0Absent 40
S&D135 MEPs
For 108Against 0Abstain 0Absent 27
ECR81 MEPs
For 64Against 0Abstain 1Absent 16
Renew76 MEPs
For 61Against 0Abstain 0Absent 15
PfE84 MEPs
For 52Against 0Abstain 6Absent 26
Greens/EFA51 MEPs
For 43Against 0Abstain 0Absent 8
The Left44 MEPs
For 25Against 0Abstain 12Absent 7
NI29 MEPs
For 6Against 1Abstain 18Absent 4
ESN27 MEPs
For 3Against 3Abstain 18Absent 3

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Germany61
  • France60
  • Italy51
  • Spain47
  • Poland44
Most against

None.

Divided delegations

None notably divided.

Full breakdown by all countries
Austria19 MEPs
For 12Against 0Abstain 6Absent 1
Belgium22 MEPs
For 15Against 0Abstain 1Absent 6
Bulgaria16 MEPs
For 10Against 1Abstain 2Absent 3
Croatia12 MEPs
For 9Against 0Abstain 0Absent 3
Cyprus6 MEPs
For 1Against 0Abstain 0Absent 5
Czech Republic21 MEPs
For 15Against 0Abstain 3Absent 3
Denmark15 MEPs
For 14Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Estonia7 MEPs
For 5Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Finland15 MEPs
For 11Against 0Abstain 0Absent 4
France79 MEPs
For 60Against 0Abstain 0Absent 19
Germany96 MEPs
For 61Against 1Abstain 18Absent 16
Greece21 MEPs
For 7Against 0Abstain 6Absent 8
Hungary20 MEPs
For 7Against 1Abstain 0Absent 12
Ireland14 MEPs
For 12Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Italy73 MEPs
For 51Against 0Abstain 9Absent 13
Latvia9 MEPs
For 8Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 6Against 0Abstain 0Absent 5
Luxembourg6 MEPs
For 4Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Malta5 MEPs
For 5Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Netherlands30 MEPs
For 30Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Poland53 MEPs
For 44Against 0Abstain 1Absent 8
Portugal21 MEPs
For 17Against 0Abstain 0Absent 4
Romania33 MEPs
For 20Against 0Abstain 1Absent 12
Slovakia15 MEPs
For 6Against 1Abstain 6Absent 2
Slovenia9 MEPs
For 7Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2
Spain60 MEPs
For 47Against 0Abstain 2Absent 11
Sweden21 MEPs
For 20Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share