← Votes·2026-07-08

Objection conformément à l'article 114, paragraphe 3: trajectoire visant à réduire la contribution aux objectifs en matière d’énergies renouvelables des biocarburants, bioliquides et combustibles issus de la biomasse présentant un risque élevé d’induire des changements indirects dans l’affectation des sols - Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets - Einwand gemäß Artikel 114 Absatz 3 GO: Zielpfad für die Senkung des Beitrags von Biokraftstoffen, flüssigen Biobrennstoffen und Biomasse-Brennstoffen mit hohem Risiko indirekter Landnutzungsänderungen zu den Zielen für erneuerbare Energie

Energy86%★

Confidence: 86%

Assigned by: rule-based classifier

Evidence:

title/description contains "energy"
title/description contains "renewable"

Reviewed: yes

Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1

View all votes on Energy →

Vote ID 195360Source: official EP roll-call records

Official roll-call results (EP minutes) ↗

/ 100

Importance Score

Low importance

Why this vote stands out:

✓Procedural or paragraph vote
✓Some political group division
✓Some national delegation divergence
✓High participation
✓Some MEPs voted against their group

Show full breakdown

Topic importance+0 / 15

Turnout+5 / 5

Vote type+3 / 25

Close vote+0 / 15

Legislative+0 / 15

Rebel votes+4 / 10

Group division+10 / 15

Country division+8 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Objection conformément à l'article 114, paragraphe 3: trajectoire visant à réduire la contribution aux objectifs en matière d’énergies renouvelables des biocarburants, bioliquides et combustibles issus de la biomasse présentant un risque élevé d’induire des changements indirects dans l’affectation des sols - Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets - Einwand gemäß Artikel 114 Absatz 3 GO: Zielpfad für die Senkung des Beitrags von Biokraftstoffen, flüssigen Biobrennstoffen und Biomasse-Brennstoffen mit hohem Risiko indirekter Landnutzungsänderungen zu den Zielen für erneuerbare Energie”. ECR, PfE, NI and ESN voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (204 for, 455 against, 3 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a procedural vote — it concerns how Parliament organises its work rather than a substantive policy decision. It is generally of lower public-interest weight, though procedural votes can still signal political alignments.

Result analysis

For

204

Against

455

Abstain

Margin of victory

251 votes

Turnout (cast)

662

Absent

Participation rate

97.5%

✓This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP178 MEPs

For 14Against 159Abstain 1Absent 4

S&D128 MEPs

For 0Against 121Abstain 0Absent 7

ECR78 MEPs

For 75Against 0Abstain 0Absent 3

PfE75 MEPs

For 74Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1

Renew74 MEPs

For 0Against 74Abstain 0Absent 0

Greens/EFA50 MEPs

For 0Against 49Abstain 0Absent 1

The Left41 MEPs

For 0Against 40Abstain 0Absent 1

NI28 MEPs

For 15Against 11Abstain 2Absent 0

ESN26 MEPs

For 26Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0

Country angle

Most in favour

Italy33
Hungary14
Czech Republic11
Slovakia8

Most against

Germany77
Spain42
France39
Poland27
Romania22

Divided delegations

Bulgaria
Czech Republic
France
Italy
Latvia
Poland
Slovakia

Full breakdown by all countries

Austria19 MEPs

For 6Against 13Abstain 0Absent 0

Belgium22 MEPs

For 6Against 16Abstain 0Absent 0

Bulgaria15 MEPs

For 6Against 9Abstain 0Absent 0

Croatia12 MEPs

For 1Against 11Abstain 0Absent 0

Cyprus6 MEPs

For 2Against 4Abstain 0Absent 0

Czech Republic18 MEPs

For 11Against 6Abstain 1Absent 0

Denmark15 MEPs

For 2Against 13Abstain 0Absent 0

Estonia7 MEPs

For 1Against 6Abstain 0Absent 0

Finland15 MEPs

For 1Against 13Abstain 0Absent 1

France74 MEPs

For 33Against 39Abstain 0Absent 2

Germany94 MEPs

For 14Against 77Abstain 1Absent 2

Greece20 MEPs

For 4Against 16Abstain 0Absent 0

Hungary17 MEPs

For 14Against 3Abstain 0Absent 0

Ireland13 MEPs

For 0Against 13Abstain 0Absent 0

Italy70 MEPs

For 33Against 33Abstain 1Absent 3

Latvia9 MEPs

For 4Against 5Abstain 0Absent 0

Lithuania11 MEPs

For 3Against 8Abstain 0Absent 0

Luxembourg6 MEPs

For 1Against 5Abstain 0Absent 0

Malta5 MEPs

For 0Against 5Abstain 0Absent 0

Netherlands29 MEPs

For 9Against 20Abstain 0Absent 0

Poland53 MEPs

For 26Against 27Abstain 0Absent 0

Portugal20 MEPs

For 2Against 16Abstain 0Absent 2

Romania30 MEPs

For 7Against 22Abstain 0Absent 1

Slovakia14 MEPs

For 8Against 6Abstain 0Absent 0

Slovenia9 MEPs

For 0Against 9Abstain 0Absent 0

Spain55 MEPs

For 8Against 42Abstain 0Absent 5

Sweden21 MEPs

For 2Against 18Abstain 0Absent 1

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…