← Votes·2026-07-08

Objection conformément à l'article 114, paragraphe 3: trajectoire visant à réduire la contribution aux objectifs en matière d’énergies renouvelables des biocarburants, bioliquides et combustibles issus de la biomasse présentant un risque élevé d’induire des changements indirects dans l’affectation des sols - Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets - Einwand gemäß Artikel 114 Absatz 3 GO: Zielpfad für die Senkung des Beitrags von Biokraftstoffen, flüssigen Biobrennstoffen und Biomasse-Brennstoffen mit hohem Risiko indirekter Landnutzungsänderungen zu den Zielen für erneuerbare Energie

Energy86%★

Confidence: 86%

Assigned by: rule-based classifier

Evidence:

title/description contains "energy"
title/description contains "renewable"

Reviewed: yes

Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1

View all votes on Energy →

Vote ID 195361Source: official EP roll-call records

Official roll-call results (EP minutes) ↗

/ 100

Importance Score

High importance

Why this vote stands out:

✓Main vote
✓Legislative procedure
✓Some political group division
✓Some national delegation divergence
✓High participation
✓Many MEPs voted against their group

Show full breakdown

Topic importance+0 / 15

Turnout+5 / 5

Vote type+25 / 25

Close vote+0 / 15

Legislative+15 / 15

Rebel votes+10 / 10

Group division+10 / 15

Country division+8 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “Objection conformément à l'article 114, paragraphe 3: trajectoire visant à réduire la contribution aux objectifs en matière d’énergies renouvelables des biocarburants, bioliquides et combustibles issus de la biomasse présentant un risque élevé d’induire des changements indirects dans l’affectation des sols - Objection pursuant to Rule 114(3): Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets - Einwand gemäß Artikel 114 Absatz 3 GO: Zielpfad für die Senkung des Beitrags von Biokraftstoffen, flüssigen Biobrennstoffen und Biomasse-Brennstoffen mit hohem Risiko indirekter Landnutzungsänderungen zu den Zielen für erneuerbare Energie”. EPP, ECR, PfE, NI and ESN voted mostly in favour, while S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (388 for, 248 against, 24 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.

Result analysis

For

388

Against

248

Abstain

Margin of victory

140 votes

Turnout (cast)

660

Absent

Participation rate

97.2%

✓This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP178 MEPs

For 159Against 14Abstain 0Absent 5

S&D128 MEPs

For 27Against 94Abstain 2Absent 5

ECR78 MEPs

For 76Against 0Abstain 0Absent 2

Renew74 MEPs

For 14Against 40Abstain 19Absent 1

PfE75 MEPs

For 72Against 0Abstain 0Absent 3

Greens/EFA50 MEPs

For 0Against 47Abstain 1Absent 2

The Left41 MEPs

For 0Against 40Abstain 1Absent 0

NI28 MEPs

For 16Against 12Abstain 0Absent 0

ESN26 MEPs

For 24Against 0Abstain 1Absent 1

Country angle

Most in favour

Poland48
Germany47
Italy44
France36
Spain31

Most against

Netherlands17
Sweden17
Denmark13
Belgium12
Ireland9

Divided delegations

Belgium
Croatia
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Latvia

Full breakdown by all countries

Austria19 MEPs

For 16Against 1Abstain 2Absent 0

Belgium22 MEPs

For 10Against 12Abstain 0Absent 0

Bulgaria15 MEPs

For 10Against 5Abstain 0Absent 0

Croatia12 MEPs

For 7Against 5Abstain 0Absent 0

Cyprus6 MEPs

For 4Against 2Abstain 0Absent 0

Czech Republic18 MEPs

For 15Against 1Abstain 1Absent 1

Denmark15 MEPs

For 2Against 13Abstain 0Absent 0

Estonia7 MEPs

For 3Against 3Abstain 1Absent 0

Finland15 MEPs

For 8Against 6Abstain 0Absent 1

France74 MEPs

For 36Against 24Abstain 11Absent 3

Germany94 MEPs

For 47Against 40Abstain 5Absent 2

Greece20 MEPs

For 11Against 9Abstain 0Absent 0

Hungary17 MEPs

For 15Against 2Abstain 0Absent 0

Ireland13 MEPs

For 4Against 9Abstain 0Absent 0

Italy70 MEPs

For 44Against 23Abstain 0Absent 3

Latvia9 MEPs

For 5Against 3Abstain 0Absent 1

Lithuania11 MEPs

For 6Against 5Abstain 0Absent 0

Luxembourg6 MEPs

For 3Against 3Abstain 0Absent 0

Malta5 MEPs

For 2Against 3Abstain 0Absent 0

Netherlands29 MEPs

For 12Against 17Abstain 0Absent 0

Poland53 MEPs

For 48Against 4Abstain 0Absent 1

Portugal20 MEPs

For 9Against 8Abstain 1Absent 2

Romania30 MEPs

For 24Against 5Abstain 0Absent 1

Slovakia14 MEPs

For 8Against 6Abstain 0Absent 0

Slovenia9 MEPs

For 5Against 4Abstain 0Absent 0

Spain55 MEPs

For 31Against 18Abstain 3Absent 3

Sweden21 MEPs

For 3Against 17Abstain 0Absent 1

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…