Objection conformément à l'article 115, paragraphes 2 et 3, et paragraphe 4, point c): Le plomb dans certains articles de pêche - Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3), and (4)(c): Lead in certain fishing tackle - Einwand gemäß Artikel 115 Absätze 2 und 3 und Absatz 4 Buchstabe c GO: Blei in bestimmtem Angelgerät
Fisheries66%★
- title/description contains "fishing"
Importance Score
High importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Main vote
- ✓Legislative procedure
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Objection conformément à l'article 115, paragraphes 2 et 3, et paragraphe 4, point c): Le plomb dans certains articles de pêche - Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3), and (4)(c): Lead in certain fishing tackle - Einwand gemäß Artikel 115 Absätze 2 und 3 und Absatz 4 Buchstabe c GO: Blei in bestimmtem Angelgerät”. ECR, PfE, NI and ESN voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (197 for, 455 against, 7 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Italy37
- Czech Republic12
- Hungary9
- Slovakia7
- Germany87
- Spain44
- France38
- Poland27
- Romania22
- Bulgaria
- France
- Hungary
- Italy
- Latvia
- Poland
- Portugal
- Slovakia
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…