EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2026-07-09

The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan

Foreign Affairs75%
Confidence: 75%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title contains non-EU country "sudan"
Reviewed: yes
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Foreign Affairs
Human Rights64%
Confidence: 64%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "human rights"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Human Rights
Vote ID 195767Source: official EP roll-call records
45
/ 100

Importance Score

Medium importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Some political group division
  • Some national delegation divergence
  • Very close result
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+0 / 15
Turnout+5 / 5
Vote type+0 / 25
Close vote+15 / 15
Legislative+0 / 15
Rebel votes+7 / 10
Group division+10 / 15
Country division+8 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan”. S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA, Left and NI voted mostly in favour, while EPP, ECR, PfE and ESN voted mostly against. The motion was rejected by a narrow margin (281 for, 285 against, 31 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions. The outcome was close, which makes individual choices and absences especially consequential.

Result analysis

For
281
Against
285
Abstain
31
Margin of victory
4 votes
Turnout (cast)
597
Absent
21
Participation rate
96.6%
⚠️This was a close vote — the margin was small relative to the votes cast.

Close vote analysis

The margin was 4 votes. 21 MEPs did not vote.

Could absences have changed the outcome? The number of absent MEPs (21) was larger than the 4-vote margin, so absences were numerically significant.

Groups whose absences exceeded the margin

  • PfEhad 7 absent MEPs (margin was 4)
  • EPPhad 5 absent MEPs (margin was 4)
  • Renewhad 5 absent MEPs (margin was 4)

Countries whose absences exceeded the margin

Hungary (7 absent)

Absences larger than the margin are numerically significant but do NOT imply the outcome would have changed. That would require modelling how each absent member would have voted, which this analysis does not do.

By political group

EPP167 MEPs
For 3Against 159Abstain 0Absent 5
S&D111 MEPs
For 108Against 1Abstain 0Absent 2
ECR67 MEPs
For 5Against 37Abstain 24Absent 1
Renew69 MEPs
For 62Against 2Abstain 0Absent 5
PfE69 MEPs
For 3Against 57Abstain 2Absent 7
Greens/EFA48 MEPs
For 47Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
The Left36 MEPs
For 36Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
NI25 MEPs
For 16Against 7Abstain 2Absent 0
ESN25 MEPs
For 0Against 22Abstain 3Absent 0

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Germany47
  • Spain30
  • Netherlands15
  • Sweden13
  • Finland11
Most against
  • France34
  • Italy30
  • Poland26
  • Romania16
  • Czech Republic14
Divided delegations
  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • Bulgaria
  • Croatia
  • France
  • Germany
  • Greece
  • Italy
Full breakdown by all countries
Austria19 MEPs
For 8Against 11Abstain 0Absent 0
Belgium18 MEPs
For 10Against 6Abstain 2Absent 0
Bulgaria14 MEPs
For 5Against 7Abstain 0Absent 2
Croatia10 MEPs
For 5Against 5Abstain 0Absent 0
Cyprus3 MEPs
For 1Against 2Abstain 0Absent 0
Czech Republic17 MEPs
For 3Against 14Abstain 0Absent 0
Denmark15 MEPs
For 10Against 2Abstain 2Absent 1
Estonia6 MEPs
For 4Against 2Abstain 0Absent 0
Finland14 MEPs
For 11Against 3Abstain 0Absent 0
France69 MEPs
For 32Against 34Abstain 0Absent 3
Germany90 MEPs
For 47Against 40Abstain 1Absent 2
Greece15 MEPs
For 6Against 9Abstain 0Absent 0
Hungary15 MEPs
For 1Against 6Abstain 1Absent 7
Ireland12 MEPs
For 8Against 4Abstain 0Absent 0
Italy54 MEPs
For 24Against 30Abstain 0Absent 0
Latvia9 MEPs
For 3Against 6Abstain 0Absent 0
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 5Against 5Abstain 1Absent 0
Luxembourg5 MEPs
For 3Against 2Abstain 0Absent 0
Malta5 MEPs
For 3Against 2Abstain 0Absent 0
Netherlands28 MEPs
For 15Against 12Abstain 0Absent 1
Poland48 MEPs
For 4Against 26Abstain 18Absent 0
Portugal19 MEPs
For 10Against 9Abstain 0Absent 0
Romania27 MEPs
For 9Against 16Abstain 0Absent 2
Slovakia12 MEPs
For 7Against 3Abstain 2Absent 0
Slovenia9 MEPs
For 4Against 4Abstain 0Absent 1
Spain53 MEPs
For 30Against 21Abstain 1Absent 1
Sweden21 MEPs
For 13Against 4Abstain 3Absent 1

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share