EuropeScopeEU
← Votes·2026-07-09

The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan

Foreign Affairs75%
Confidence: 75%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title contains non-EU country "sudan"
Reviewed: yes
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Foreign Affairs
Human Rights64%
Confidence: 64%
Assigned by: rule-based classifier
Evidence:
  • title/description contains "human rights"
Reviewed: no
Methodology: topic-rules-v0.1
View all votes on Human Rights
Vote ID 195769Source: official EP roll-call records
61
/ 100

Importance Score

High importance

Why this vote stands out:

  • Main vote
  • Legislative procedure
  • Some political group division
  • High participation
  • Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Topic importance+0 / 15
Turnout+5 / 5
Vote type+25 / 25
Close vote+0 / 15
Legislative+15 / 15
Rebel votes+10 / 10
Group division+6 / 15
Country division+0 / 15

Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.

What was this vote about?

This vote concerned “The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan”. EPP, S&D, ECR, Renew, Greens-EFA, Left, ESN and NI voted mostly in favour. PfE mostly abstained. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (476 for, 28 against, 96 abstentions).

Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.

Why it matters

This is a main (final) vote on a dossier — the decisive moment where the European Parliament adopts or rejects a legislative or political text. These are the votes that most directly shape EU law and policy, and the ones citizens and journalists should watch most closely.

Result analysis

For
476
Against
28
Abstain
96
Margin of victory
448 votes
Turnout (cast)
600
Absent
18
Participation rate
97.1%
This was not a close vote — the margin was comfortable.

By political group

EPP167 MEPs
For 143Against 2Abstain 18Absent 4
S&D111 MEPs
For 109Against 0Abstain 1Absent 1
ECR67 MEPs
For 35Against 2Abstain 29Absent 1
Renew69 MEPs
For 65Against 0Abstain 0Absent 4
PfE69 MEPs
For 12Against 24Abstain 26Absent 7
Greens/EFA48 MEPs
For 48Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
The Left36 MEPs
For 35Against 0Abstain 1Absent 0
ESN25 MEPs
For 14Against 0Abstain 11Absent 0
NI25 MEPs
For 14Against 0Abstain 10Absent 1

Country angle

Most in favour
  • Germany63
  • Spain51
  • Poland42
  • France41
  • Italy32
Most against

None.

Divided delegations
  • France
Full breakdown by all countries
Austria19 MEPs
For 13Against 0Abstain 6Absent 0
Belgium18 MEPs
For 15Against 0Abstain 3Absent 0
Bulgaria14 MEPs
For 7Against 1Abstain 4Absent 2
Croatia10 MEPs
For 9Against 0Abstain 1Absent 0
Cyprus3 MEPs
For 2Against 1Abstain 0Absent 0
Czech Republic17 MEPs
For 13Against 1Abstain 1Absent 2
Denmark15 MEPs
For 13Against 0Abstain 2Absent 0
Estonia6 MEPs
For 6Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Finland14 MEPs
For 14Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
France69 MEPs
For 41Against 24Abstain 1Absent 3
Germany90 MEPs
For 63Against 0Abstain 25Absent 2
Greece15 MEPs
For 10Against 1Abstain 4Absent 0
Hungary15 MEPs
For 7Against 0Abstain 1Absent 7
Ireland12 MEPs
For 11Against 0Abstain 0Absent 1
Italy54 MEPs
For 32Against 0Abstain 22Absent 0
Latvia9 MEPs
For 6Against 0Abstain 3Absent 0
Lithuania11 MEPs
For 11Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Luxembourg5 MEPs
For 5Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Malta5 MEPs
For 5Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Netherlands28 MEPs
For 23Against 0Abstain 5Absent 0
Poland48 MEPs
For 42Against 0Abstain 6Absent 0
Portugal19 MEPs
For 17Against 0Abstain 2Absent 0
Romania27 MEPs
For 20Against 0Abstain 6Absent 1
Slovakia12 MEPs
For 10Against 0Abstain 2Absent 0
Slovenia9 MEPs
For 9Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0
Spain53 MEPs
For 51Against 0Abstain 2Absent 0
Sweden21 MEPs
For 21Against 0Abstain 0Absent 0

Individual MEP positions

Loading individual positions…

Download & share