Temporary derogation from certain provisions of the ePrivacy Directive to combat online child sexual abuse
Civil Liberties64%★
- title/description contains "privacy"
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Strong political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Temporary derogation from certain provisions of the ePrivacy Directive to combat online child sexual abuse”. PfE, ESN and NI voted mostly in favour, while EPP, S&D, Renew, Greens-EFA and Left voted mostly against. ECR mostly abstained. The motion was rejected by a comfortable margin (114 for, 422 against, 60 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Slovakia7
- Cyprus1
- Germany65
- Spain45
- France38
- Italy31
- Poland24
- Cyprus
- France
- Slovakia
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…