Temporary derogation from certain provisions of the ePrivacy Directive to combat online child sexual abuse
Civil Liberties64%★
- title/description contains "privacy"
Importance Score
Low importanceWhy this vote stands out:
- ✓Some political group division
- ✓Some national delegation divergence
- ✓High participation
- ✓Many MEPs voted against their group
Show full breakdown
Methodology: importance-v0.1 · The Importance Score is a prioritisation indicator. It does not judge whether a vote is good or bad.
What was this vote about?
This vote concerned “Temporary derogation from certain provisions of the ePrivacy Directive to combat online child sexual abuse”. S&D, PfE, Renew, ECR, Greens-EFA, Left, ESN and NI voted mostly in favour, while EPP voted mostly against. The motion was adopted by a comfortable margin (369 for, 236 against, 6 abstentions).
Automated summary generated from official vote metadata and observed voting patterns. Not a legal interpretation.
Why it matters
This is a substantive vote (such as an amendment or resolution) that contributes to shaping the final position of the Parliament on a dossier. It reflects the political direction taken on specific provisions.
Result analysis
By political group
Country angle
- Germany59
- France53
- Italy42
- Poland26
- Netherlands23
- Spain39
- Romania15
- Hungary13
- Portugal12
- Czech Republic9
- Austria
- Croatia
- Czech Republic
- Finland
- Greece
- Ireland
- Lithuania
- Luxembourg
Full breakdown by all countries
Individual MEP positions
Loading individual positions…